All behaviours are now implemented including a combat group based tactical retreat. It all just needs a little tuning now. The main blocker at this point is just a slew of editor bugs, specifically with behaviour trees. Hopefully they’ll be fixed soon.
Over the Christmas holidays I implemented the base of a cover system including the AI. It’s pretty raw right now and there’s a lot that needs ironing out, but it’s getting there. The AI selects cover based on their current weapon and the players last known location. Cover can also be invalidated in a number of ways by the player. The next steps will involve augmenting the group logic for the enemies with tactical retreats and advances to create some real flow and movement to the encounters.
While we wait for the next round of concept art for our Midnight project, I’m working on a cover based shooter in UE4.
Auto generating cover often yields messy results so I’ve opted for a hand placed solution, and this little script just makes that process far far less painful.
I’ve recruited (OK, more like persuaded) the very talented Damian Buzugbe to work on the game.
Damian is a concept artist who has been in the industry since time began… or at least, longer than I have. Most notably he was the lead character artist on the Fable games. Check out his blog: Here.
So here are some extremely early doodles of our game’s protagonist – an attempt to capture the form of a middle eastern refugee but in a more abstract and more fantastical style.
This is a Unity prototype of a dynamic world that’s the center of a small game I’m currently working on. I’m now porting the project to UE4 which should be pretty fast, but in the meantime I thought I’d share.
This system provides an open world experience while allowing us to tell a very linear story and have it not feel forced. The player can walk in any direction they choose, but once certain conditions are met the next chunk of world that instantiates will contain the characters or setting for the next beat of the story. If you turn and walk the other way you’ll find it appearing in front of you again. The story is, in part, about unavoidable events in a person’s life and I think the gameplay mirrors this nicely. You seem to have choice, but in actual fact what happens to you is already predetermined.
Here a system of slots arranged in a hexagonal grid maintains the pieces that you walk on, and can choose to instantiate a special tile from a queue if the conditions are met.
Ignore my awful designer / programmer art and the hideous Unity default character.
My god UE4 is fantastic. The level of thought that’s gone into the system is phenomenal.
After having played around with it for a short while and done some prototyping for our current project, I’ve decided to switch my side project over from Unity.
One of the main reasons for this, apart from how easy it is to use, is that we now have an animator on board! Very exciting, and UE4 has far superior animation systems.
I’ll start posting videos of the game very soon – I’ve re-worked the core system to support some pretty cool stuff in our little dynamic, procedural world which I’m looking forward to unveiling!
Ok so I think this is pretty cool. I also think this is one of THE ways you should create core mechanics.
Simply – I’m creating a jump in a game, but this is so important to get right. A good jump is a little bit of positive feedback every time you hit the button. It can be addictive and genuinely fun. A bad jump makes you feel like you’re fighting against the controls. In fact most people don’t notice when a jump is good or bad, they just like one game and not the other and they don’t know why. This stuff is important.
So this is how I’m doing it –
I’m using this easing function generator to create and tune the appropriate curve and then converting the function into C# and plugging it into my code. This is the initial result using a standard curve, it’s not right yet but it already feels like it’s on the way.
Next I need to gut that site’s (very kindly freely available) code and create a solution that will give me more control over the curve and allow live editing
Ok so first I want to start by saying that I am thoroughly bored with violent games. This all came from trying to think about something that could truly replace it. But why is violence so popular in games?
So here’s a couple of theories.
1. Violence is easy to program. It’s far easier to program some bullets and health than it is to program complex interactions. Artificial intelligence too is much simpler when all it has to do is run around and shoot at the player. Kind of a dull point though this one, and there are always ways around technical problems.
2. Violence provides players with something to master. You see my first thought when thinking about replacing violence was something like an adventure game in which you try and find, say, a long lost sibling. You could build an entire game around this and there could be a myriad of challenges along the way involving meeting and talking to new characters mainly – but the mastery would be missing. That one core skill you practice again and again and are ultimately tested on. You could build a game without it, but something would definitely be lost.
So let’s just replace it with something – for the sake of argument let’s change the story. You’re a tennis pro searching the land to become the ultimate player. You travel in search of new challengers. But the problem with this is that it doesn’t provide the bite sized challenges that violent games do – you’d be limited to less, more meaningful encounters because a game of tennis takes a significant amount of time.
Violence is actually very well suited to a medium in which progression is so key. Bite-sized encounters hone your skill ready for the ultimate test at the end. Also from a more abstract design point of view, violence works nicely to clear the path of the blocking challenger once you’ve bested them, allowing you to continue on.
There is a lot that you get for free with a violent game mechanic – it fits games very well. In fact even in the real world you’d be hard pressed to find something that allows small meaningful rounds of challenge better than fighting does. I’ll keep thinking though..
…perhaps a game about a wondering debater in a world full of the opinionated…
Ultimately I think the answer is to simply come up with some activity and an excuse for why everyone challenges you at it, like Pokemon. Surely though there must be a more elegant solution…